If you ask the average man on the street,
your average joe, many times their image of politicians is that of a bunch of
fat sweaty cigar-chomping guys in dark smoky rooms in the bowels of Capitol
buildings making deals and decisions that affect the people without their
input. In some cases those deals are as clear as day, other times, not as much,
and the deal makers are not the sweaty cigar-chompers but the people you would
least suspect.
Since the birth of the nation, Americans have
had a very simple distinct way of determining who and how many they send to
Washington to represent them. That process has always been based on a national
census taken every 10 years and is mandated by the Constitution. Based on
population, Congressional districts in every state grow, shrink, or even
disappear depending on the number of its citizens.
But what if something else had happened? What
if Congressional districts were determined not just by elections, but a lack of
an election? What if the sweaty cigar-chompers decided amongst themselves where
they would aggressively campaign and where they would not, basically affecting
the outcome of an election?
Take Missouri for instance, and why wouldn’t
we? Missouri is an interesting place for many reasons. Like many other states
there are the urban population centers and there are the rural areas. But when
you look at a map of Congressional districts is where it gets really
interesting. Again, like many other states, much of the big cities garner more
Democrat votes and the rural areas tend to lean more Republican and
Conservative and get those votes. But in Missouri, a very sharp, clear line has been drawn between those areas. Has
anyone bothered to ask why?
St. Louis and the surrounding area has a
long history of being a Democrat stronghold. The Gateway City has not had a
Republican Mayor since 1949. The first Congressional district has not had a
Republican representative since, you guessed it, 1949. But at some point the
Republicans simply stopped showing up for the election. Do they not owe it to
the Republicans, no matter how few of them live in the district, to at least
put up a vigorous fight?
One of America’s most divisive periods in its
history was the 1960’s, and St. Louis was certainly not immune. The City’s
foray into massive public housing complexes was the infamous Pruitt-Igoe
housing complex. The experiment quickly went south and by the late 60’s it
became apparent that it was going to have to be torn down. But what to do with
all the tenants? Where would they go? In 1968 Missouri’s first Congressional
district elected its first African-American Congressman, and in an era where it
may have been quite a battle to get a black congressional candidate elected.
Could the powers that be might have decided that he needed a little help? After
all, a census year was approaching in 1970 and based on those numbers, new
district lines would be drawn. But on an even grander scale, and in true
Democrat fashion, how to ensure that that district would remain Democrat indefinitely?
How do they ensure that that first black Democrat Congressman has that job as
long as he wants it? Would some concessions have to be made?
It sounds like the stuff of urban legends. No
one has any real proof but many have heard the story. Could one have those
back-room cigar-chomping deals have been made in the form of a trade off?
Democrats get the urban areas of Kansas City and St. Louis City, and the
Republicans leave them alone, while the GOP would hold sway over the rural
areas of the state and the Democrats would remain fairly quiet. While many
show-me state political watchers would chuckle and promptly dismiss the whole
notion as some black helicopter conspiracy theory, some of the most seasoned
veterans of Missouri’s political battles say it is entirely possible.
Martin Baker, three-time Republican candidate
for Congress in Missouri CD1 says, “As our Party has consistently failed to
support any congressional candidate who challenges the status quo in the urban
areas and make our Party be electorally accountable to the people of those
areas, Republicans are waving the white flag of surrender each electoral cycle
and also when the district lines are redrawn by the General Assembly every ten
years. Under Missouri law, any resident of the state can run in ANY
Congressional District, regardless of if they are a resident of that district,
so easily the GOP could recruit the best and brightest to stand for nomination
and election in CD1 or CD5 (Kansas City) but the GOP consistently leaves those
districts to die on the vine by not encouraging a “Party All-Star” to run and
then either underfunding or not funding at all those races so it does give one
consideration of possible political collusion.” Robyn Hamlin, two-time
Republican nominee for CD1 agrees. She says that while she does not know what
the agreement might have been for the Kansas City area, she is “very positive”
that it happened in St. Louis. She went on to say that she believes the major
players that might have taken part in such an agreement are either out of
politics or deceased.
Does concrete evidence exist somewhere that
such brokering took place, more than likely decades ago? Does someone’s spouse,
children, or political protégé know the real story? Will someone offer up a
death bed confession? Will others decide to dig deeper and find out the truth
once and for all? Good questions. But perhaps the best question of all, don’t
the residents of Missouri’s first and fifth congressional districts deserve to
know all the choices before them prior to an election, instead of having that
election decided for them?
Don’t they
deserve to know the truth?
No comments:
Post a Comment